Discussion about this post

User's avatar
William Pittman's avatar

Regarding RTO: From my vantage point there seems to be three drivers

1. Productivity: An honest belief that in-person collaboration significantly improves the results of some roles or tasks. It's arguable which roles or tasks those are, so easier to just ask everyone to come back in. Early-career professionals almost certainly benefit from in-person mentorship.

2. Management Control: A non-trivial number of managers feel somewhat powerless or ineffective if they if they can't visibly monitor their direct reports. They may honestly believe that they are pushing for RTO in the name of productivity, eg. that their team is more productive if they are in person with the manager to "lead" them. But really this one is about control.

3. Sunk Cost: Business that own or have long-term leases to buildings don't want to admit to the bad investment (and certainly executives don't want that on their performance review!). So they need some reason to bring people back in, and given #1 and #2 productivity is an easy claim to make.

The author's thesis is kind of an extreme version of #3, where "corporate landlords" have a significant amount of control over the businesses they lease to. Or maybe that "the elite" who lead business also all own commercial real estate. I don't buy that argument. It doesn't match my understanding of the current reality.

Expand full comment
Fionnuala O'Conor's avatar

Hung, I'd be delighted to come talk about the research I've been doing with women in tech (400 women tech leaders in 60 countries) - lots of findings your community might find interesting, including some demographic surprises, the underappreciated #1 booster of tech women's success, what women in tech really want from their next job - and why they might consider leaving where they are now.

Expand full comment
6 more comments...

No posts